Do You Know Where Your Food Came From?


Today, there are two different ways of farming – industrial and sustainable.  Industrial agriculture is the modern way of farming when factories mass produce food.  Sustainable farming is when farmers use the traditional way of farming using environmentally, economically, and morally correct methods to produce healthy food.

Most of the foods we find in our local grocery store are made from industrial agriculture.  Are they actually healthy, cheap and the solution to world hunger?

Cows in industrial farms.
Industrial agriculture uses chemicals to mass produce food.  The pesticides used in industrial farming would leak into the soil, which eventually leak into the ground water and lakes, poisoning the water.  When an animal gets sick, they are injected with antibiotics.  When we eat the animals, we are more resistant to antibiotics, making medicine less effective.  In order to mass produce food, they inject animals with hormones to quicken their growth process (see right). 

Cows in sustainable farms.
In sustainable agriculture, however, they try to prevent the use of pesticides by using biological control and pest-resistant plants to control unwanted pests.  Instead of using antibiotics, sick animals are pulled away from the herd.  Animals are treated with respect; they carry out their natural behaviours and hormones are not used (see right).

Most people believe that food made from industrial agriculture is cheaper than food made on sustainable farms.  For example, organic bananas cost around $0.79/lb while non-organic bananas cost around $0.69/lb.  At first glance, non-organic food may seem cheaper, but once you factor in the price for treatments and risks in health, it is much more expensive. 

Does industrial agriculture provide more diverse choices?  No it doesn’t.  Industrial farming uses a technique called monoculture crop system, where they only produce one type of crop.  Sustainable agriculture uses different techniques which would preserve biodiversity.

The most misbelieved fact about industrial agriculture is that it would help save the world from hunger due to the mass production of food.  However, this isn't true.  Poverty is usually not due to lack of food but not being able to get access to food.  Industrial agriculture increases the chance of poverty.  It increases the general cost of farming, so it is now harder for farmers to produce food on their own to support their community.  The lack of farmers would lead to lack of food production.  This is then compensated by using industrial agriculture to mass produce food.

I think that the benefits of industrial agriculture do not outweigh the risks.  It’s like saying that it’s better to eat food that could potentially kill you than to spend more money for a not only a healthier but a more ethnical choice.  I think that the largest problem is not convenience and price but the lack of information and knowledge to the consumers.  If people were well educated about the dangers of industrial agriculture, I think that they would choose sustainable agriculture over industrial (watch video to see more ‘myths’ about industrial agriculture).


Child educating adults about industrial farming.


RESOURCES:

PICTURE RESOURCES:

VIDEO RESOURCE:

COMMENTS:

Lets Design A Baby!


Steps to create a healthy baby through PGD
The term 'designer baby' is given to babies that are genetically modified through a process called Pre-Implantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD).  During this process, a three day old embryo (containing around six cells) is tested for genetic diseases.  When the embryo is declared healthy, it gets implanted in the mother’s womb.  The embryo was created through a process called In Vitro Fertilization (IVF).  In this method, the egg and sperm are fertilized outside the body instead of inside the mother’s womb. This method was originally used to prevent hereditary diseases such as blindness.

For example, Chris and Tanya Kirby wanted to have children. However, they were worried that the child  would inherit a heart disease that Chris had.  They decided to turn to artificial insemination to ensure that their future children were healthy (see right).  Due to their choice they successfully welcomed healthy twins to their family. 

As the treatment became more popular, future parents were seeking for a way to alter the physical appearance of their offspring (see steps below).  Others may want to create a ‘saviour baby’ – a child designed to with healthy and compatible cells to save an older sibling from an illness.  In these situations, they use a small chip coated with DNA called a microarray.  The chip allows one to analyze single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to predict different traits of the baby such as hair and eye colour.

[designer baby]
Steps of In Vitro Fertilization to alter physical appearance of baby
Because it uses relatively new technology, it is quite expensive.  The Kirbys had to pay almost thirty thousand dollars to ensure that their child is healthy.  The treatment is not always successful either; Canada’s average success rate is about 20%.  Women under 40 have a greater (one in four) chance than older women (one in ten) for success.  These, unfortunately, are not the only consequences that the parents have to pay.  Once their child finds out about it, who knows how they would react. 

This idea may seem very appealing at first, but problems regarding ethical issues arise.  

Most parents would want their child to be born healthy. I don’t think that there is anything ethically wrong about using this technology to ensure that.  However, I think it is taking a step too far to use this technology to change a baby’s feature or to create a baby to heal another child.  I don't think parental love would be affected by the physical appearance or the health of the child - they would (at least they should) love their child no matter what.  Developing a child to heal another child is basically using them as a tool.  The baby is a human being.  We are too.  Sometimes, we become too greedy in striving for the better when things are fine they way they were.  On this issue, I believe that it’s better to not let science interfere with nature’s way.


RESOURCES:


PICTURE RESOURCES: